Apple not so green

The Apple computers are leaders in innovation and design and may be hip with their consumers. However, according to Greenpeace, Apple computers are anything but leaders when it comes to displaying good environmental policies.

According to the Guide to Greener Electronics which was recently updated by Greenpeace, Apple was ranked last on environmental issues because of its continued use of harmful chemicals in many of the products that it manufacturers. Also, Apple’s “bad green policy” is showcased with its poor efforts at promoting its iPod recycling.

Apple relies on toxic chemicals and plastics for its computers. A study conducted by Greenpeace showed that Apple’s MacBook Pro Laptops contained at least one more type of a toxic flame retardant chemical than any other top brand. Such chemicals not only pollute the environment when they are disposed of but are also potentially harmful to users.

Steve Dowling, Apple’s spokesman, took opposition to the findings and the criteria that was used in judging its policies. He said that Apple scored high on other environmental rankings such as being the leader in eliminating the use of lead-containing cathode ray tube monitors. Apple also touts its promotion of wireless technology, thereby helping to eliminate the use of harmful PVC (polyvinyl chloride) cables and wires.

Nokia continues to hold the top spot on the list for its electronic waste disposal and chemical policy. Dell follows close behind in terms of environmental friendliness, specifically due to its computer recycling program.

In terms of the company that has made the most improvements, Motorola takes away the prize because it makes more than 30 mobile phones and other products that do not contain any harmful chemicals.

CRICOS Provider Code: 00098G